Today’s News-Gazette1 has an interesting article on Chancellor Wise’s refusal to have UIUC meet with the City of Urbana to discuss UIUC’s partnerships with Carle and how those partnerships affect Carle’s lawsuit with the State of Illinois and Urbana over Carle’s taxes.
So here’s the Gazette on the meeting of the Urbana mayor Laurel Prussing with Wise to discuss larger talks:
Prussing met Friday with Chancellor Phyllis Wise and invited the UI to co-host a community forum on Carle, which is embroiled in a battle with the city over tax exemptions. The chancellor declined.
“We appreciate Urbana’s situation, but this discussion should be led by Urbana, not the university,” Wise said Monday through a spokeswoman.
Hmmm, how odd, it sounded as if UIUC wasn’t being asked to lead, simply to commit to joining in a discussion. Again quoting from the Gazette article:
Prussing sought the meeting with Wise, arguing that the impact of the taxation issue and rising health insurance costs in the community go beyond Urbana’s borders, affecting the university, every local business and social service agencies. They also tie in to discussions Wise convened two years ago about “micro-urban transformational leadership” to improve the community’s future, she said.
Prussing said she wasn’t surprised by Wise’s response.
“I’m not offended,” Prussing said. “She’s got other things to deal with.”
The UI and Carle are partnering on a proposal to build a new engineering-based medical school in Urbana, with Carle pledging $100 million toward the project.
1. How could Chancellor Wise refuse Urbana’s offer of “Civil Discourse” at its best?
Ms. Wise’s declining the Urbana offer hardly seems an example of what the she seems to hold near and dear: “civil discourse.” So here’s an excerpt from Ms. Wise’s blog of 8–14-14 on the Salaita Affair:
The decision regarding Prof. Salaita was not influenced in any way by his positions on the conflict in the Middle East nor his criticism of Israel. Our university is home to a wide diversity of opinions on issues of politics and foreign policy. Some of our faculty are critical of Israel, while others are strong supporters. These debates make us stronger as an institution and force advocates of all viewpoints to confront the arguments and perspectives offered by others. We are a university built on precisely this type of dialogue, discourse and debate.2
“Dialogue, discourse and debate,” how euphoniously alliterative! But … well, if dialogue & discourse & debate are really these critical principles, wouldn’t you think UIUC would be eager to engage in dialogue & discourse & debate over what it has going on behind closed doors with Carle?
After all, as far as I can tell, dialogue & discourse & debate all take at least two parties; and as much as Clint Eastwood impressed with the empty chair on the stage, it would be infinitely better if the discussion Urbana wants to have about UIUC’s community involvement took place with UIUC actually there on the platform.
2. A DDoS-FOIA opportunity — let’s put the Marvel Family to work.
There are lots of other things I could say about this fascinating call of Chancellor Wise for dialogue & discourse & debate (“D3”), and how it seems D3 was lacking in what Salaita said but is present in abundance in the Chancellor’s declining the opportunity for public discussion with Urbana.
But my talk is cheap. So instead, let’s use the DDoS-FOIA approach and bring in the Marvels to procure and share the emails and other documents Chancellor Wise has exchanged over Laurel Prussing’s offer.
3. What the Marvels might ask UIUC-FOIA.
Now I’m not one to tell superheroes what to do or how to do it. So I have no script for what one or more of my mysterious Marvels milling out there might enquire of UIUC-FOIA on the topic of Wise’s actions. That said, I’m sure we’d all agree it would run something along the lines of:
Please provide all emails and other documents sent by Chancellor Wise or personnel in her office regarding Laurel Prussing’s asking Wise to have UIUC cohost the discussion with Urbana.
As I said in my earlier post, I can’t myself file this FOIA request without incurring a waiting period of months and months. And although the law isn’t completely clear on it, heavens forbid that I should have someone else act as a mere minion of mine and FOIA to my specifications.
But I’ve no doubt that there are more than a few Captain Marvels, Juniors, Uncle Marvels, Mary Marvels and — as the marquee image shows — even Baby Marvels, all of whom are out there in cyberspace and are interested in following up on this quite independently of me.
The language: you’re superheroes, use your own language. The address? Merely click on the link UIUC FOIA and follow the directions. And keep in mind that you can file anonymously, so your name can be whatever you want, “Mary Marvel,” say, or “Mary FOIA” if you prefer.3 And since you can file anonymously, the only contact information you need provide is your email. Check the Illinois Attorney General’s facts on FOIA filings if you have any doubts: How to file a FOIA request.
I don’t think this needs to be said, but: in your FOIA, be polite, the people at UIUC-FOIA are mostly very nice, and D3 is a good principle no matter if the people proposing it obey it or not.
4. What to expect (when you’re expecting).
In term of timing, UIUC-FOIA will get back to you in about a week, then they can take an extra 5 days under Illinois law. But come new years you should hear something back … then you can share it with all of us!
The marquee image is from page 24 of that same issue #1 of Dec, 1945, of Marvel Family Comics. See Marvel Family Comics #1.