The University of Illinois FOIA Office (“UIUC-FOIA”) doesn’t like me, I’m what was for a time called a “vexatious filer,” meaning that (in addition to prancing around onstage yelling “Ta Ra Ra Boom Der Ay”) I file lots of FOIAs. Probably over 100 in less than a year and still counting.
Now as I’ve said many times already, if you file 100 questions in one email, that’s exactly one FOIA, which UIUC-FOIA will reject as “unduly burdensome” because the total of what they have to do is too much. And I understand that.
On the other hand, if you try to prevent the claim of “undue burdensomeness” by filing 100 separate emails with only one question in each, you’ll be branded a “vexatious filer” and subjected to multiple delays as well as that label for 1 year.
So what’s a feller to do? And where did this “vexatious filer” thing come from?
As far as the first question, keep in mind that UIUC-FOIA has no procedures (see early blogs) and is trigger-happy to claim requests are unduly burdensome. So it’s very hard to figure out how to cast a wide enough net to have a hope of getting answers from them without filing enough questions to have them slam you as a “vexatious filer.”
1. Alsip and the 90 FOIAs filed the same day.
As for the second question, it turns out the impetus for this change in Illinois FOIA law came about in the Chicago suburb of Alsip, a village of about 20,000 people. Seems that the former police chief didn’t much like the mayor, so he (the chief) filed 90 FOIAs on one day, 9–7-10, thus overwhelming the Alsip FOIA office and prompting the Alsip mayor to lobby his state senator to seek the changes in the law:
“Look, we are not trying to stop any legitimate claims for information,” said Alsip Mayor Patrick Kitching, who asked his state senator to file a bill that could limit the rights of political enemies to inundate agencies with records requests.
“It gets to a point where people in the office can’t do the public’s business. We’ve been paralyzed by someone who is using FOIA as a weapon,” Kitching said, referring to a stack of 90 records requests his village received one day last year from a former police chief and Village Board candidate locked in a bitter political feud with the mayor.1
1. The 90 FOIAs, for your delectation.
I’m never one to overlook data, and the Alsip story was too fascinating — and the end-result too-close-to-home, so I FOIAed the good people of Alsip to get copies of every single one of those 90 FOIAs.
Let me be perfectly clear on this: the FOIA officer in Alsip is a really really really nice lady! I filed the FOIA before Christmas, 2014, she got back to me promptly and politely, and we quickly agreed that I was more than willing to delay the response until after the holidays, so as not to over-tax their office. And because I’m an all-around-nice-guy, UIUC-FOIA’s opinions of me notwithstanding.2
In due course I got the 90 FOIAs, and I present them here for your viewing pleasure:
dalzell1_Redacted
dalzell2_Redacted
3. UIUC-FOIA, you may not like my FOIA filings, but I’m not vexatious, so please stop making snotty remarks about me.
If you look at those 90 FOIAs, you’ll quickly see how much destructive intent went into them. The filer might as well have asked the Alsipians to count the squares of toilet paper they had on hand.3
My FOIA filings, on the other hand, may be annoying to UIUC personnel and the FOIA office, but they’re not anything like that Alsip case. So why do the fine UIUC people feel it so important to constantly comment on the number of appropriate filings I’ve made:4
Now perhaps Ms. McCarthy just wants to highlight the fact that UIUC-FOIA needs to make sure I haven’t renewed my vexatious-filer status? Sure, that’s a possibility … but based on the things UIUC-FOIA had to say about me in its responses to various of my FOIA appeals to the Illinois Attorney General’s office, I think the reason is simpler: UIUC-FOIA thinks I’m a bad seed, rather than a public citizen seeking the truth.
I’ll close with some UIUC-FOIA verbiage to that conclusion –5 apparently I ought sip a brandy and smoke a good hand-rolled cigar between each email I send?
About the Marquee image (available at V&A Music Sheet Covers)
Music sheet cover, ‘Ta-ra-ra-boom-de-ay’
Music sheet cover
’Ta-ra-ra-boom-de-ay’
Sung by Lottie Collins
Designed by W. T. Stannard, printed by Charles Sheard and Company, written by Richard Morton, music arranged by Angelo A. Asher
About 1891
Museum no. S.4105–2009
© Victoria and Albert Museum, LondonMusic hall performer Lottie Collins became a household name thanks to the song ‘Ta-ra-ra-boom-de-ay’ and the dance that went with it. She would begin the song slowly and quietly and then at the end of the first verse she would leave a long pause, put one hand on her hip and launch into the chorus and a wild can-can dance. Her high kicks, accompanied by a big drum and ‘an excited foam of lace petticoat’ delighted or shocked audiences, depending on their sensibilities. The playwright George Bernard Shaw went to see her perform in 1892 while still in his 20s and described how she did three low kicks on the ‘Ta-ra-ra’ and then a high kick on the ‘boom’. He added admiringly, ‘Miss Collins appears to be in fine athletic training.’
- See Chicago Tribune, 4-3-2011 at Chicago Tribune — Change in FOIA law. [↩]
- Actually I believe it’s more likely not the FOIA officer per se, but rather likely Laura Clower in that office, who’s convinced I’m suing UIUC (I’m not),likely Laura Frerichs, who apart from being head of the Research Park seems to think I’m “harassing” her by filing FOIAs, etc. etc. It would be funny if it weren’t pathetic. [↩]
- Note that UIUC-FOIA would either have responded the request was a) unduly burdensome, or b) that FOIA law does not require them to compile records that aren’t already compiled. Either way, UIUC-FOIA would make sure you didn’t know if they had a square to spare. [↩]
- From the UIUC-FOIA FOIA production 14–252. [↩]
- See Scheinman FOIA Appeals (thus far) [↩]